REALonomics

NEW Franchise Blender-Extractor Available for 2009 Holidays!

---

Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 3

---

This is the third installment of a three part post entitled Unlocking Franchise Economics (see Part 1, see Part 2)

Have we ever wondered how the consumer views our real estate industry franchises? If we are going to unlock franchise economics and truly understand the value propositions inherent in franchising we must also see them (franchises) as the consumer sees them and we must ONLY value them as does the consumer.

If you were to create a list of distinctions…real ones…dynamic ones…that separate one franchise brand from another in the eyes of the only true client, the consumer, what would those distinctions be and how are they manifest in the process of transacting business?

Enjoy the PhotoBlog below. Read it carefully and ask yourself what might happen if the consumer could place all franchises into one blender and extract the best. What would the “best” be? What are the clear distinctions between franchise A, B and C?

If franchises have any value, and REALonomics believes they do, what is the empirical value to the consumer? Is franchise value a black-and-white proposition or, will we see living color coming out of the recession in 2009 and beyond? What changes do franchisors need to make to create distinction in local markets? Can distinction even be created and sustained? Do we need to blend the franchises? Do we need fewer franchises? Will franchises be blended out of economic necessity and through mergers and acquisitions?

If a Broker/Owner adopts a franchise model what is the set of “measureable” distinctions derrived from the relationship that will impact the consumer? Specifically, how do franchise distinctions create revenue for Broker/Owners in the crowded marketplace?

Obama & a New Real Estate Industry

On Friday, November 7, 2008, flanked by some of the most prominent names in the economic and business world, President elect Barack Obama held his first press conference. The central topics, the nation’s economy and of course, the “first mutt.” We will blog about the mutt later…for now, more serious stuff looms.

The Obama news conference was followed this morning, Saturday, November 8, 2008 by a radio address with similar content. These two initial events give us hints about the Obama economic model that will shape America and of course, the real estate industry for perhaps decades.

Attacking the Economy Means Controlling the Outcome

The Obama team is going to attack the economy in laser-like fashion. New rules are going to be written that will impact the private sector and retool the way in which those transactions dependent upon credit and lending work.

REALonomics has believed for some time (years, actually) that the real estate industry needed to redefine itself through sweeping consumer-centric changes driven mostly by standards based brokerage and maximum transparency.

What we never knew and could never predict are the bleak economic factors that now give rise to the transformation of our business models and have fueled a meltdown of home values in such universal proportions. Principle: Economic problems left unsolved by the private sector typically invite government mandated intrusions in order to harness the favor of the electorate.

Can the RE Industry Still Write its Own Rules

It is beginning to look a lot like the real estate industry will be shaped not by factors we control but by the policies and rules created by others. We, under the mantle of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), have, for the most part, missed most of our opportunity to define and shape the debate and participate in the rules that will create a “New Real Estate Industry.” NAR’s mistaken endorsement of the $700 billion bailout program has hurt us and created a dependency relationship with the federal government. In essence, we have been placed in the unenviable position of a reactive industry rather than a proactive force.

Do we still have the clout and the courage to write our own rules? Do we have the will power, discipline, leadership and the creative inspiration to recognize that we are on the cusp of a “New Real Estate Economy” wherein we can control the rules that dictate how the industry operates within a consumer-centric era? Have we become an industry, like so many before us, that will eventually become reliant upon the solutions created by a bloated federal bureaucracy that is more interested in centralizing power than in actually empowering people?

The Key Principle behind Rule-Writing

It’s not so much the rules per se, that govern business matter as it is the economic and social viewpoints of those who pen the rules. It’s always belief that precedes policy. What we believe about our industry is different that what Washington believes. There are principles behind rule-writing, always!

The key principle behind rule-writing is simply “BE THE RULE WRITER.”

Here are but some of what REALonomics believes will be the “new rules” evolving from the financial policies that will be put in place during what will be increasingly defined by the new Administration as a “crisis.” A history lesson…bureaucracies flourish best when set in motion during “crisis.”

NEW RULE 1: There will be a heavy emphasis on creating a bevy of legislation designed to control each aspect of the mortgage lending process. This sounds good until we understand the difference between our and Washington’s definition of transparency and disclosure. The new set of rules will further slow the markets while everyone waits to see and then create a whole new layer of regulations and regulators operating in the basement of every mortgage lender.

NEW RULE 2: Crack down will be the new operative language for not only Wall Street and so-called “overpaid CEO’s” but also those within the real estate industry who are not fully compliant with Rule #1. REALonomics thinks that real estate brokers will become targets for industry crack down and the eventual police force for compliance with new lending and transaction rules. In his website Barack Obama has already pledge to crack down on brokers and lenders.

NEW RULE 3: NAR will become more and more dependent upon government approval for the implementation of our industry policies and procedures that have sustained us for decades. NAR, already reeling from the DOJ debacle, will have a mandated hotline to Washington and will need to use it to check-in, seek approval and help implement the new rules that will be written. In essence, NAR could become an extension and purveyor of brokerage and home ownership policies written by the Obama administration, Pelosi’s House and Reid’s Senate.

Although the housing industry is suffering and the real estate industry is under siege, REALonomics would like to encourage the industry to step up to the plate and position itself under a new set of operating principles that can be sent to Washington as a demonstration of our commitment to operating and policing our own industry. We are still strong enough to influence the outcomes if we are proactive rather than reactive.

Let’s continue to remind ourselves that the key principle behind rule-writing is simply “BE THE RULE WRITER.”

Get the full transcript of the Barack Obama news conference and read between the lines.

Greenspan Admits “Mistake” calls the Credit Crisis a 100 Year “Tsunami”

REALonomics has roughed up Alan Greenspan over his support of the concept of subprime lending and his denial of any contribution to the collapse of the credit markets. See the post.

It looks like Mr. Greenspan has finally started to step up to the plate with acknowledgements that his thinking was less that stellar.

Today, in a hearing before the House Oversight Committee Greenspan finally acknowledge, if only by innuendo, that his judgment fell short of what was needed to predict the housing market decline.

“Given the financial damage to date, I cannot see how we can avoid a significant rise in layoffs and unemployment.

With respect to Greenspan’s belief that banks would act in the best interest of shareholders, Greenspan said his thinking was wrong because there was, “a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works.” The current crisis was referred to by Greenspan in his opening statement: “We are in the midst of once-in-a-century credit tsunami.”

In essence Greenspan called this a “mistake” in how he viewed the integrity of banks and mortgage companies. Makes us wonder if he just fell off the turnip truck.

Of the current financial crisis, Greenspan said that it “turned out to be much broader than anything that I could have imagined.”

Unfortunately, Mr. Greenspan has not yet acknowledged his “mistake” in his endorsement of subprime lending as something good for consumers. Perhaps another day.

Bush to Federalize Nine Major Banks

Syndicated from iVoteAmerica

Well, by George, he’s given new meaning to “compassionate conservative” by federalizing the banking and capital systems on his way out of office!

Don’t let the swinging door slap you backside on your way back to Crawford, Mr. President.

According to the Bush Banking proposal, nine major banks have accepted the notion of partial government partnership. These banks are: Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo.

Watch this video:

George Bush is implementing the G7’s recommendations for government partnership with American banks. In other words, free money from American taxpayers to shore up the international economy.

Is this the new federal socialization of our economy? Bush said, “The government’s roll will be limited and temporary…” Can anyone name a federal program which, after implemented, remained limited or was temporary?

For the full story, visit this morning’s (Tuesday, October 14, 2008) article by Washington Post Staff Writers Howard Schneider, David Cho and Neil Irwin, entitled “Bush Defends Government Bank Investment.”

Government Interference has Harmed American Real Estate Wealth

EDITORIAL

REALonomics urged the real estate industry to reject the $700,000,000,000 government bailout program.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) took the opposite position and even launched a national public relations campaign designed to convince us, the members, to support something that historically we have never supported, government interference in the private sector free market.

Well, here we are, a few days hence, witnessing the most massive loss of personal and real estate wealth in the history of the world.

Now let’s talk about the real estate industry specifically. The central wealth producing asset of most Americans is their investment(s) in real estate. Our industry has been dedicated to the creation of wealth through home ownership supported by one’s ability to qualify for mortgage financing and to service the debt based upon qualifying ratios.

It appears we have adopted a position that runs counter to our industry’s historical roots. But worse than that, through industry support of the bailout we have actually made a fundamental mistake in economic judgment and we may have harmed the ability of brokerage firms and agents to be effective ambassadors and cousellors to consumers.

Are we ready to exchange a long-held traditional and fundamental economic model for a new system where the notion of “bail-out” through subsidized real estate welfare is a valid competing model?

Should NAR have supported the $700 billion bail out? We don’t think so and we said so in our post entitled “Warning: RE Industry will be Harmed if Bailout is Backed by Us” on September 30th, 2008.

REALonomics calls on NAR to reverse its position and return to our historical position where we only believe in the American dream of home ownership where individuals and families, under the guidance of sound advice from Brokers and agents, purchase homes they can afford.

NAR’s support of the bail out was wrong and we should make that admission to the American people so that we can regain the trust of consumers.

« Previous Page — Next Page »