Indeed we are engaged in our own industry Cirque du Soleil, a kind of three-ringed act that pushes us to the limits of our economic envelope.

How long can we strike the pose? What series of events will begin the process of reversing the downturn and return some degree of stabilization to the economy. Our collective muscles quiver under the stress of our rigid contortions.

Not too long ago we mistakenly thought, although few will now admit to their acquiescence, that TARP, auto industry bailouts, AIG cash infusions, cash for clunkers, first time home buyer credits, bank loans and the like would magically restore the economy.

Even the National Association of Realtors (NAR), our beloved national union and lobby force, with enthusiastic recklessness, endorsed just about every form of redistribution of wealth forced down our throats by President Barack Obama’s misguided group of tax and spend advocates.

Yes, ours is an industry not too unlike a three ringed circus. There are jugglers, tight rope walkers, clowns, acrobats, lion trainers and bare-back horse riders, all entertaining us while we sit in the grand stands eating our Cracker Jack and cotton candy.

We love a good circus. A good circus takes our minds off the trouble we face. The acts bring momentary relief from the pain we must inevitably face when the show is over and the big tent comes down.

The reality we must face is the choice we made, repeatedly from 2000 through 2007 to made a series of choices that led us to depart from the traditional, sound economic principles that guided our industry in favor of massive personal, corporate and national debt. The circus is over and even the clowns no longer smile.

REALonomics has taken tough positions and we have always attempted to lend our voice to a call for temperance as the circus acts rolled into the big tent, one after another while our industry, clapped, laughed, cheered, jeered and refused to admit the depth of economic adjustment that was about to engulf us.

There is another message we have pushed into the industry for serious discussion and that is the need for top-to-bottom reform, beginning with an examination of the function of NAR, local Associations and indeed our very bloated labor force.

Not many will deny the circus is over. Fewer still will acknowledge the need for comprehensive analysis of the business structure of our industry and how it delivers economic value to entrepreneurs.

A remnant of hard-liners still delivers a false message of a restored economy that will support our 1,000,000± participants, an unbelievable membership count that has no relevance to sound economic and business reality.

Our economy is irrevocably tied to global networks. The real estate industry now has its best shot at reformation. Who will lead the transformation and what forms will it take? What transcendent person, group or entity will emerge with solutions to the complex problems we face as an industry?

How will technology, economics, localism, property data and global realities be bent and shaped to create new vibrant business models that can produce and sustain profitability required for the risks inherent in the real estate business.

After all, the show must go on!

Related posts:

1. Warning: RE Industry will be Harmed if Bailout is Backed by Us

Syndicated from e-Partner

Owners are engaged in the delicate balancing act; walking on the razor’s edge, barefoot.

Slicing into Profit

The razor upon which owners must balance themselves is now slicing so deeply into revenues that profitability is now proving more and more illusive. Today’s Broker/Owners are confronted with an economy that is not rebounding fast enough to enable them to survive.

e-Partner has long held that Broker/Owners are the financial backbone of the real estate industry and that their survival should be one of the top priorities of our industry through 2010.

Our Bleeding Feet

The razor’s edge takes no prisoners and yields no concessions to owners who are struggling to meet their ever increasing general operating expenses. Trapped by the same economic factors faced by other businesses, owners are looking for ways to decrease fixed and personally guaranteed obligations.

e-Partner talks to owners from every brand and those who are independent and the story is generally the same. There are simply too few closing and too much bricks-and-mortar operating expenses. “There is just not enough transaction commission to meet the monthly demands we have,” one broker/owner told us.

Mandatory Agility

Agility, created and sustained, is the first of the Ten Commandments of the New Real Estate Economy.

Although we are not quick on our feet, the razor’s edge is sensitizing us to perils of standing still for too long in one place. Our bloated organization body weight presses down on the sharp stainless steel edge and this slices away large chunks of capital required to sustain retail models.

New principle: the razor’s edge is now an owner’s continuing reality and he/she/all of us will learn to walk on this edge nimbly and quickly or, we will be cut to pieces.

Dancing to a New Beat

Dance or be cut! The stakes have never been higher. But can owners find revenue, create revenue, jettison unnecessary expenses and learn the new beat fast enough to escape the razor’s edge?

Short answer is yes. The long answer is that we can only only escape the razor’s edge if there is the will to accept the truth that some of the old operating fundamentals are no longer adequate and may never be.

Many brokers are holding on, digging in, hunkering down, waiting for the much discussed and heralded market turn-around.

Standing still on a razor’s edge is not recommended. What we do recommend are these immediate actions:

1. Redirecting bricks-and-mortar costs to new market penetration models that can reposition your brand, create recruiting opportunities and new transaction revenue. Shift from facility management and uni-market branding to horizontal branding and multi-market management. ASK US HOW.

2. Include fee-based cash flow models as a part of your total market revenue model. This includes remodeling for up to 65% of you agent team being fee-based agents…AND…including pay for placement models where local supporting services such as insurance companies, new homes contractors and property management companies become total market revenue partners with your firm via flat fee online ad positions. ASK US HOW.

3. Acquire and merge with smaller companies that can open markets to your brand in minor and intermediate markets and create these acquisitions with a “work from home” model, such as e-Partner advocates. This M&A approach allows an owner to expand his/her company without the corresponding capital demands associated with traditional business models. ASK US HOW.

4. Develop and implement consumer-centric social networking models and make them a part of the core personality of your company. Pursuing transparent Internet models that bring the consumer into a partnership with your online presence. There are reasons for the success of Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and YouTube. Consumers want to be empowered to express themselves and create online presence through dialogue. ASK US HOW.

Should the current economic trend continue for 2-3 years it is predictable that many organizations will be forced to close their doors. However, Broker/Owners are still in a position to re-define their business models by cutting and redirecting expenses into affordable growth models.

Our websites will not save us. Our brands will not save us and technology alone is not the solution.

However, understanding the economic eras of the real estate industry and how technology dictates and defines Broker/Owner profitability can help Broker/Owners see the relationship between their models and current trends. Please watch this presentation and post your comments.

Related posts:

1. By Owners, for Owners
2. Dear Owners, the Border Patrol is out in Force

Brokers, Boards, Books and Buildings remain the economic blocks that continue to drive our brokerage profit models. Three of the four are still alive and kicking. What are the Four Bs, how do they function and what, if anything, do they mean to us now? More importantly, how do they meet contemporary consumer expectations?

Broker/Owners are literally the financial backbone of the real estate industry. e-Partner and this blog, REALonomics, support the importance of sustaining the roll Broker/Owners play in perpetuating real estate transactions and indeed propping up the industry at large. It is Broker/Owners who literally guarantee the financial stability of the industry. They are real estate’s preeminent risk-takers.

They are almost always the sole guarantors of market presence and it is they who take most of the personal financial risk for the real estate organizations operating within thousands of communities.

Fact: Broker/Owners are losing their ability to produce and sustain profit for their local brokerage firms. The risks now out weigh the rewards, as many are discovering. TWe are facing the financial collapse of many Broker/Owners.

Broker/Owners have increasing lost their grip on the consumer due largely to (1) the widespread availability of property information to agents and consumers; (2) the industry’s empowerment of the vast numbers of agents with cutting-edge tools that tie them directly to consumers and (3) the irrelevance of their control over local Associations, formerly called “Boards of Realtors” and the centralization of power over consumer access to property by NAR.

Broker’s once maintain an iron grip on local property information through NAR’s establishment of Boards of Realtors owned by Broker/Owners. Broker/Owners still have stated authority over local Associations but their is little or nothing for them to control and their role is primarily administrative and therefore without economic benefit.

WATCH THIS PRESENTATION

Each local Board of Realtors (BOR) (now called “Association of Realtors”) once commanded total control over local property information on behalf of the paying members. It was the Broker/Owners that owned and controlled the local property information data, how it was received, formatted and distributed.

Through the BOR, Owners owned (no pun intended) and controlled ALL property information and ALL access to the information, whether by agents or the consumer. Therefore, they were assured of income and barring reckless squandering of funds they were also assured of a perpetuation of their profit and existence.

Through such property information control, Broker/Owners were able to set individual brokerage listing fees, control agent commissions and literally decide who could play and who could not play.

The union of Brokers and Boards coupled with geographic market definitions and control of property information meant that ALL consumers were required to work through one channel of expertise for any real estate investment, that being Broker/Owners.

Local BORs were compelled to comply with local Broker/Owners who were the ligitimate owners of property information within a specified regional area. All of this engineered and mandated by NAR.

WATCH THIS PRESENTATION

It might surprise many of our readers when we tell you that the primary technology used during the era of Broker and Board control was ink and paper.

The Board of Realtors’ MLS Book was the officially designated and exclusive repository for local property information. It was, in fact, the technology used by Brokers and Boards to distribute property information to consumers through the Broker’s agents.

To distribute new property information for use by agents, who were the monitors and purveyors of current property data to consumers, a new MLS book was printed at regular intervals. At the moment of printing, the data was defective, as some properties were sold and other listed for sale prior to print.

Data updates were facilitated through thousands and thousands of local MLS meetings held each week across the nation. At these ritual gatherings agents arrived, books and marking pens in hand, for the local property information “update” wherein properties were declared “sold” by agents and then robotically lined through in the MLS book.

Price adjustments were written into the margins of the MLS book along with other information verbally supplied by agents.

These meetings were quite the scene. Nonetheless, they represented the manner in which property information was collected, distributed, managed and updated for the ultimate end user, the consumer.

Let’s also remind ourselves of the operative phrase of that generation of Broker/Owners, Caveat Emptor, Latin for “Let the buyer beware.” In those days, the buyer was an unsuspecting consumer who was not at all represented in a real estate transaction but instead was told by us, “we only represent sellers but promise to treat all parties to the transaction fairly and honestly.”

WATCH THIS PRESENTATION

This brings us to the fourth “B” and the central pillar of the real estate business model used by Broker/Owners…Buildings.

The Brokers who owned the Boards published the Books that were placed in the hands of agents who were warehoused in Buildings in just about every market in the U.S.

The Buildings were the primary real estate market expression used by Broker/Owners. Bricks and mortar was the economic junction where consumers were provided with the most important and manditory requirement for acquiring relevant property information. Such information was only provides by agents in buildings owned or leased by brokers with books in hand that were printed by the boards.

In those days the components necessary for a real estate transaction to occur came together in a Broker/Owner’s office; these being buyer, seller, broker and property information. in those days we were the true “gate keepers” of the transaction.

Yard signs, newspaper ads, open houses and updesk calls were the path to consumer contact and ultimately a commission. These ingredients were the spider web designed to capture consumer buying leads in the local market.

Consumers had very little control over the process of buying real estate, a process completely controlled by Broker/Owners and their local marketing machines.

Circa 1970. Something began to happen in the late 60s and early 70s. National real estate franchising came into play and began to redefine a Broker/Owner’s market from local to regional and even national.

Franchising brought with it the first real attempt to provide Broker/Owners with a horizontal component to their business model, increasing their potential for referrals and relocation by means of national branding and networking with member of like kind.

During this same time frame, local Boards began to digitize property data and to generate computerized MLS systems that could deliver property data to a Broker’s office electronically. This would later prove to be the beginning of the end of one of the four Bs, the Book.

About 25 years after the first digitized MLS endeavors began . Computerized MLS, personal computers, modems and ultimately the Internet came into play and provided the empowerment of agents and consumers with ubiquitous real estate information.

In 1994, MLS property information became available on the World Wide Web (WWW), known then as the “Information Super Highway.”

Today, the MLS books are gone. Buyer beware is gone.

What still remains, hanging by an economic thread are the remaining three Bs; Brokers, Buildings and Boards (renamed Associations).

The total control of local property information by local Associations is being challenged and seems to be eroding.

Each of the remaining three Bs is now under scrutiny by an increasingly powerful consumer. It looks like the next “B” to fall is the notion of “Buildings” as an ultimate but now unaffordable retail expression of a Broker/Owner’s real estate market presence.

REALonomics, as a student, analyst, crytic and developer of concepts related to the real estate industry’s business models, can’t help but wonder which of the remain two “Bs” is most in jeopardy:

Will it be Broker/Owner or our local Associations of Realtors (Boards) that will be transformed or eliminated?

Your thoughts?

WATCH THIS PRESENTATION

Related posts:

1. Home Price Declines Hit New Records: What Can the Industry Do?
2. The Inman Comment
3. Our Genie is on the Loose & Fresh out of Wishes

President Obama flew into Arizona to announce his blueprint for a $75,000,000,000 mortgage bailout known as the “Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan.”

REALonomics has digested the preliminary outline of this program which claims to “…offer assistance to as many as to 9 million homeowners…” through a combination of loan modifications and propping up of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, support for state housing authorities and financial incentives for lenders to re-tool existing loans for a predefined set of homeowners whose mortgages fall into specific qualifying categories.

How does it Work and who are the Beneficiaries?

Will the President’s plan make a difference and if so, to whom and when? And, is the plan a sound economic model that will actually help homeowners facing foreclosure, as claimed by the administration? Is this another step in the direction of creating a dependency upon the federal government for and on the part of some Americans and lending institutions?

Let’s take a look at the plan and ask some hard questions.

The plan, set to kick into gear on March 4, 2009, uses carefully calculated qualifying formulas based upon principal mortgage balance ceilings, rigid LTV ratios and market value reductions. The result is yes, some homeowners will be assisted. If you own property in California where 60% of the mortgages exceed $417,000, you will not qualify.

At this point, it looks as if those with higher end home values and jumbo or super jumbo loans are not going to be granted any relief. Only first position mortgages qualify. If you have a second, its only value is to help justify a reduction of the first based upon its contribution to your debt to income ratio.

DOWNLOAD THE EXAMPLE DOCUMENT HERE.

What’s the Financial Carrot for the Lenders?

The plan states that “Treasury will partner with the financial institutions to reduce homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments.” In effect, the taxpayer will be matching the reductions lenders approve on a “dollar-for-dollar” basis to a write down to a 31% debt-to-income ratio for borrowers and lenders will be required to keep the modifications in place for five years.

We will all be funding cash payments to the lenders to pull off the Obama plan. Lenders will receive up-front fees in the amount of $1,000 for each eligible modification. Lenders will also receive bonus payments monthly as long as the borrower stays current on the loan. Are you in favor of such support to lenders?

There’s more! Lenders will be given $1,500 for taking action with those homeowners who are NOT in default or behind in payments and an additional $500 for servicers for modification made while a borrower at risk of imminent default is still current. Is this something you like?

Still more! The government (taxpayers) will also pay up to $1,000 each year against principle balances on loans where the borrower is current on their mortgage payments. This takes place each year the borrower is current for up to 5 years. How does this sound to you?

Are we actually creating a new hybrid sub-prime mortgage product that is simply financed by taxpayers with newly printed money backed by loans from foreign banks?

DOWNLOAD THE PROGRAM FACT SHEET.

Are the Capital Market Supporting Obama’s Plan?

In short, the financial markets have already started to reject the plan with CitiGroup stock dropping to less than $2 and Bank of America plummeting on fears of nationalization of their enterprises and indeed the government control of the financial backbone of the American economy.

Since the federal government started tinkering with banks, throwing our TARP money, setting forth plans to retool mortgages and delivering so-called bailout plans, the stock market has plunged to pre 2002 levels with historic losses, indicating a continued lack of confidence on the part of investors in federal bailout programs.

Another interesting question those of us in the real estate industry should be asking is whether or not this plan will actually stop the reduction of home values, open the credit markets for new sales and stop foreclosures?

What would happen if we just left the market alone? We are already seeing banks stepping up to the plate to solve the problem without taxpayer support.

Do we want our industry’s future to be predicated on total control of the lending and qualifying process, government determination of property values and a segmentation of homeowners into various classes and categories based on home values? Or, do we have more confidence in the free market to work its way through this problem.

REALonomics believes we have only seen the beginning of the creation of a “Nanny State” that may result in more damage to the economy. To top it all off, the CEO of Bank of America has been subpoena in an attempt to force disclosure of bonuses paid to bank executives prior to BofA receiving TARP funds.

Are we thinking long term? Should we back off and let the markets self-correct? Are we willing to take on massive personal obligations for government backed mortgage solutions? How will the “Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan” impact our children and grandchildren?

DOWNLOAD THE 14 QUESTION FAQ DOCUMENT.

Related posts:

1. The Federalization of our Financial System at your Expense
2. Home Price Declines Hit New Records: What Can the Industry Do?
3. Gekko was Wrong…Greed is Bad

This time around, however, NAR is getting it right and deserves the support of the industry…yes, I have already sent my letter to my elected officials supporting “The Four Point Plan” put forth by by NAR. REALonomics is endorsing this plan with comments inserted into NAR’s message that was emailed to members.

NAR has urged Congress to include the following provisions in any future legislation:

NAR POINT ONE: Make the $7500 tax credit available to all purchasers and eliminate the repayment requirement. The credit’s limited availability and required repayment terms have severely limited the credit’s appeal to potential homebuyers. As a result, the credit has not been widely used or proven effective at stimulating sales.

REALonomics: We concur. The tax credit should be a true credit against taxes, however, and at the descretioin of the buyer, be taken in one year or extended to up to three years of equal credit deduction. This would allow each consumer some flexibility in the application of the credit based upon income and other factors. In addition, we would like to see the deduction made available to investors who purchase in calendar year 2009.

NAR POINT TWO: Make the 2008 FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits permanent. New rules for 2009 would significantly reduce the FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limit from their 2008 levels. Now is not the time to limit the availability of affordable mortgages.

REALonomics: This part of NAR’s plan needs further clarification for members. In general, we concur, but the devil could be lingering in the details on this one.

NAR POINT THREE: Get the Emergency Treasury bank relief program back on track by targeting more funds to mortgage relief efforts and increasing efforts to mitigate foreclosures. Don’t just give the banks unrestricted cash. Make the program work to improve mortgage and housing markets as it was originally intended.

REALonomics: Yes, NAR, this position is the correct one! We were all burned by the ambiguity of the emergency relief program and we, in fact, got hood-winked into believing that toxic mortgages were going to be purchased and sold to investors at discounts. In fact, the banks just banked (pun obvious) the bucks or, in some cases used the funds to purchase other banks. But the problem is also an empowered Treasury Secretary who could simply redirect the funds in just about any way he so desired. To date not a single mortgage has been purchased and resold. The mitigation of foreclosure loses is a tricky one and REALonomics takes a very conservative approach to how this should work. Consumers who are in default should not be rewarded without some additional tax incentives to those who are not in default. We cannot reward bad behavior. Leveling the playing field is going to require caution and discipline.

NAR POINT FOUR: Permanently bar banks and banking conglomerates from engaging in real estate brokerage and management. The banks have proven they have enough to do to simply properly manage their current lines of business. Do we really want them to manage the home buying process? Imagine what could have been the situation now if they already had the added ability to engage in real estate sales.

REALonomics: On this point REALonomics disagrees with NAR. Point four should not be on the table at this time. Although we are not yet convinced that we should advocate bank brokerage models, there remains a lot of room for discussion on how banks can collaborate in economic partnerships with real estate brokerage firms in order to shore-up the profitability of each to the benefit of the consumer. It’s understandable why NAR, as a preservation move, would call for this issue to be addressed and finalized. REALonomics still advocates streamlined and consumer-centric home buying/home financing models. Such models might be created out of financial partnerships that are carefully blueprinted so that banks and brokerage can maintain levels of expertise.

CLICK HERE to take action on the NAR Four Point Plan (NAR members only).

Related posts:

1. NAR Reports it’s Stimulus Progress

No related posts.

Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 3

This is the third installment of a three part post entitled Unlocking Franchise Economics (see Part 1, see Part 2)

Have we ever wondered how the consumer views our real estate industry franchises? If we are going to unlock franchise economics and truly understand the value propositions inherent in franchising we must also see them (franchises) as the consumer sees them and we must ONLY value them as does the consumer.

If you were to create a list of distinctions…real ones…dynamic ones…that separate one franchise brand from another in the eyes of the only true client, the consumer, what would those distinctions be and how are they manifest in the process of transacting business?

Enjoy the PhotoBlog below. Read it carefully and ask yourself what might happen if the consumer could place all franchises into one blender and extract the best. What would the “best” be? What are the clear distinctions between franchise A, B and C?

If franchises have any value, and REALonomics believes they do, what is the empirical value to the consumer? Is franchise value a black-and-white proposition or, will we see living color coming out of the recession in 2009 and beyond? What changes do franchisors need to make to create distinction in local markets? Can distinction even be created and sustained? Do we need to blend the franchises? Do we need fewer franchises? Will franchises be blended out of economic necessity and through mergers and acquisitions?

If a Broker/Owner adopts a franchise model what is the set of “measureable” distinctions derrived from the relationship that will impact the consumer? Specifically, how do franchise distinctions create revenue for Broker/Owners in the crowded marketplace?

Related posts:

1. Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 2
2. Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 1
3. REALONOPOLY – Does Anyone Still Wanna Play this Old Game?

The Obama news conference was followed this morning, Saturday, November 8, 2008 by a radio address with similar content. These two initial events give us hints about the Obama economic model that will shape America and of course, the real estate industry for perhaps decades.

Attacking the Economy Means Controlling the Outcome

The Obama team is going to attack the economy in laser-like fashion. New rules are going to be written that will impact the private sector and retool the way in which those transactions dependent upon credit and lending work.

REALonomics has believed for some time (years, actually) that the real estate industry needed to redefine itself through sweeping consumer-centric changes driven mostly by standards based brokerage and maximum transparency.

What we never knew and could never predict are the bleak economic factors that now give rise to the transformation of our business models and have fueled a meltdown of home values in such universal proportions. Principle: Economic problems left unsolved by the private sector typically invite government mandated intrusions in order to harness the favor of the electorate.

Can the RE Industry Still Write its Own Rules

It is beginning to look a lot like the real estate industry will be shaped not by factors we control but by the policies and rules created by others. We, under the mantle of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), have, for the most part, missed most of our opportunity to define and shape the debate and participate in the rules that will create a “New Real Estate Industry.” NAR’s mistaken endorsement of the $700 billion bailout program has hurt us and created a dependency relationship with the federal government. In essence, we have been placed in the unenviable position of a reactive industry rather than a proactive force.

Do we still have the clout and the courage to write our own rules? Do we have the will power, discipline, leadership and the creative inspiration to recognize that we are on the cusp of a “New Real Estate Economy” wherein we can control the rules that dictate how the industry operates within a consumer-centric era? Have we become an industry, like so many before us, that will eventually become reliant upon the solutions created by a bloated federal bureaucracy that is more interested in centralizing power than in actually empowering people?

The Key Principle behind Rule-Writing

It’s not so much the rules per se, that govern business matter as it is the economic and social viewpoints of those who pen the rules. It’s always belief that precedes policy. What we believe about our industry is different that what Washington believes. There are principles behind rule-writing, always!

The key principle behind rule-writing is simply “BE THE RULE WRITER.”

Here are but some of what REALonomics believes will be the “new rules” evolving from the financial policies that will be put in place during what will be increasingly defined by the new Administration as a “crisis.” A history lesson…bureaucracies flourish best when set in motion during “crisis.”

NEW RULE 1: There will be a heavy emphasis on creating a bevy of legislation designed to control each aspect of the mortgage lending process. This sounds good until we understand the difference between our and Washington’s definition of transparency and disclosure. The new set of rules will further slow the markets while everyone waits to see and then create a whole new layer of regulations and regulators operating in the basement of every mortgage lender.

NEW RULE 2: Crack down will be the new operative language for not only Wall Street and so-called “overpaid CEO’s” but also those within the real estate industry who are not fully compliant with Rule #1. REALonomics thinks that real estate brokers will become targets for industry crack down and the eventual police force for compliance with new lending and transaction rules. In his website Barack Obama has already pledge to crack down on brokers and lenders.

NEW RULE 3: NAR will become more and more dependent upon government approval for the implementation of our industry policies and procedures that have sustained us for decades. NAR, already reeling from the DOJ debacle, will have a mandated hotline to Washington and will need to use it to check-in, seek approval and help implement the new rules that will be written. In essence, NAR could become an extension and purveyor of brokerage and home ownership policies written by the Obama administration, Pelosi’s House and Reid’s Senate.

Although the housing industry is suffering and the real estate industry is under siege, REALonomics would like to encourage the industry to step up to the plate and position itself under a new set of operating principles that can be sent to Washington as a demonstration of our commitment to operating and policing our own industry. We are still strong enough to influence the outcomes if we are proactive rather than reactive.

Let’s continue to remind ourselves that the key principle behind rule-writing is simply “BE THE RULE WRITER.”

Get the full transcript of the Barack Obama news conference and read between the lines.

Related posts:

1. Obama, McCain and Real Estate
2. Home Price Declines Hit New Records: What Can the Industry Do?
3. Is the Future of Real Estate in Google’s Algorithm?

It looks like Mr. Greenspan has finally started to step up to the plate with acknowledgements that his thinking was less that stellar.

Today, in a hearing before the House Oversight Committee Greenspan finally acknowledge, if only by innuendo, that his judgment fell short of what was needed to predict the housing market decline.

“Given the financial damage to date, I cannot see how we can avoid a significant rise in layoffs and unemployment.

With respect to Greenspan’s belief that banks would act in the best interest of shareholders, Greenspan said his thinking was wrong because there was, “a flaw in the model that I perceived is the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works.” The current crisis was referred to by Greenspan in his opening statement: “We are in the midst of once-in-a-century credit tsunami.”

In essence Greenspan called this a “mistake” in how he viewed the integrity of banks and mortgage companies. Makes us wonder if he just fell off the turnip truck.

Of the current financial crisis, Greenspan said that it “turned out to be much broader than anything that I could have imagined.”

Unfortunately, Mr. Greenspan has not yet acknowledged his “mistake” in his endorsement of subprime lending as something good for consumers. Perhaps another day.

Related posts:

1. Greenspan…Endorsement of Subprime?
2. Gekko was Wrong…Greed is Bad
3. The Inman Comment

Syndicated from iVoteAmerica

Well, by George, he’s given new meaning to “compassionate conservative” by federalizing the banking and capital systems on his way out of office!

Don’t let the swinging door slap you backside on your way back to Crawford, Mr. President.

According to the Bush Banking proposal, nine major banks have accepted the notion of partial government partnership. These banks are: Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo.

Watch this video:

George Bush is implementing the G7′s recommendations for government partnership with American banks. In other words, free money from American taxpayers to shore up the international economy.

Is this the new federal socialization of our economy? Bush said, “The government’s roll will be limited and temporary…” Can anyone name a federal program which, after implemented, remained limited or was temporary?

For the full story, visit this morning’s (Tuesday, October 14, 2008) article by Washington Post Staff Writers Howard Schneider, David Cho and Neil Irwin, entitled “Bush Defends Government Bank Investment.”

Related posts:

1. Bush: Federalizing the Economy?
2. Paulson Pushes Bush Plan to Revamp the U.S. Financial Regulatory System
3. The Federalization of our Financial System at your Expense