Brokerage Models, Consumerism, Franchisors, Management Principles, REALonomics

Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 1

July 28, 2008 by REALonomics · 4 Comments 

Franchise LockAlthough relatively new, franchising has a powerful presence in the historical flow of the real estate industry and has shaped many outcomes and market realities since its inception.

Some broker/owners would claim that a franchise has made them incredibly successful, while others would say they have failed miserably with respect to leveraging a franchisor’s brand and its prima fascia value propositions.

However, despite the predominance of real estate franchising a large number of real estate brokerages still prefer their independent status and some of these have become their own franchised brands, capitalizing on the economic dividends available to them through leveraging themselves.

Although franchising is a powerful force within the industry, REALonomics believes there is still too little careful analysis and quantification of franchising’s market and economic value on the part of owners.

Quantifying a Franchise Value Remains Elusive

In addition, the ability to create economic performance models for a franchise, judge its market impact on a forward moving basis (trending), fully understand the costs and benefits to owners, agents and most importantly, to understand with as much certainty as possible the way in which consumers view franchises, remains quite elusive.

Franchising is a powerful economic consideration for broker/owners and an initial term can represent as much as fifty percent of the life cycle of a contemporary brokerage firm. For some time, franchisors have been negotiating initial franchise commitment terms that will run more than a decade. Another perspective is to consider the lifespan of an executed franchise agreement in terms of the changes that will occur within the industry during this “initial term” of a franchise agreement.

REALonomics will be posing questions, analysis, insights and extending some limited advice regarding how broker/owners can unlock the door to franchise economics. It’s this door that we believe is the key to identifying the benefits to adoption of a real estate franchise.

In true fashion, we will steer our spotlight of analysis and critique on the not-so-oft understood downsides of franchising. We will highlight and accentuate the benefits as we see them. We will ask the powerful questions that should be asked of franchisors who in turn ask broker/owners to pledge their companies to a particular brand at a cost that can sometimes be astronomical.

Framing the Franchise Analysis Correctly

We will help frame questions broker/owners can use to ask franchisors to quantify their economic delivery, their stated marketing value propositions and to clarify the broker/owner’s recourse for sub-standard performance on the part of a franchisor. We will suggest ways for franchisors to remodel some of their old propositions and presuppositions that cannot and do not create value for owners and how they can and should be delivering transparent, consumer-centric solutions that can differentiate them with owners, the market and consumers.

This will be fun, challenging and perhaps a little ugly at times. At the end of the day we hope REALonomics delivers some value to broker/owners, to its general readership and to franchisors.

We want our readers to be a part of the content, so your posted comments, insights, experiences (good or bad), together with private emails and other communication with us will be welcomed by everyone.

Our objective is to see if we can unlock the door to franchise economics, since the state claim of real estate franchisors is their delivery of an economic enhancement and a stronger overall market asset. Broker/owners need to know how a franchise can and should perform on their behalf and how to make the critical judgments associated with the cost versus benefit relationship.

Some initial questions about franchise value might include the following:

  1. What is a franchise worth to an owner, i.e., what should today’s initial and ongoing cost be? How do franchises differ from one another, if at all?
  2. What is the preeminent economic value of a real estate franchise to Broker/Owners and to agents? Why have new franchises such as Keller Williams and EXIT Realty been successful in the midst of a very crowded playing field?
  3. Do consumers have predisposition toward franchise names or, are consumers neutral when it comes to loyalty?


Broker/owners, franchisors and agents are invited to post comments about their franchise experiences, good, bad or indifferent. If you wish to communicate but do not want to post a comment you can use our traditional Contact Form.

Yikes! What have we started now?

Related posts:

  1. Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 2
  2. NEW Franchise Blender-Extractor Available for 2009 Holidays!
  3. Three Stooges: ‘09 Acid Test #2
  4. REALONOPOLY – Does Anyone Still Wanna Play this Old Game?
  5. The Second Economic Wave

Comments

4 Responses to “Unlocking Franchise Economics: Pt 1”
  1. Chris Svec says:

    I’m the Vice President of New Market Development for Real Living, a 4,000 agent company with 180 offices in 20 states. The contact link on your site is not working, how can I post our information on your site?

    Please let me know as we’d welcome the opportunity to participate.

  2. REALonomics says:

    Chris, thanks for noticing and reporting the linking problem in our emails. We have fixed this. The problem had to do with whether we or a user uses “www” as the prefix to the website. If you simply use, for example, http://realonomics.net/contact it would work. Using http://www.realonomics.net/contact, it would not. We adjusted our redirects now so that it works either way. Thanks again, and please participate with more comments. – REALonomics

  3. Hi, I just read your article on franchises and wanted to share a learning
    experience that I had.
    When I moved to Colorado my Wisconsin license was no good so I needed to
    start over. I went to a well known company that had bought a “best known at
    the time franchise” and added it to their respected name. I went there
    because a friend invited me. Within a year or so two more franchises were
    sold in our city with the same brand and although the ads read “each office
    is independently owned and operated” our reputation was so pulled down by
    the other two companies we threw our franchise away and were forced to give
    up our well known and good name because of the franchise agreement.
    There are rules but when the companies are most interested in selling
    additional franchises it is hard to measure moral and ethical integrity (and
    may be easier to ignore).
    When I started my own company years later and knew that I wanted to have a
    network of offices of like minded people I knew that franchising would not
    work for me but quite frankly did not come up with a good alternative and so
    am still a one office broker with more ideas then I can put into practice.
    I am looking forward to future articles.

  4. REALonomics says:

    Mary, you have touched on a franchise issue that is very valid and in some cases stands in conflict with owner profitability. Some franchisors will saturate a market because they prefer more than one owner and higher revenues from franchise fees. Franchisors have a model that is based upon how much GCI they can extract from a market and they can severly limite income for a Broker/Owner by over-branding a market with multiple offices.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!