realonomics

Although relatively new, franchising has a powerful presence in the historical flow of the real estate industry and has shaped many outcomes and market realities since its inception.

Some broker/owners would claim that a franchise has made them incredibly successful, while others would say they have failed miserably with respect to leveraging a franchisor’s brand and its prima fascia value propositions.

However, despite the predominance of real estate franchising a large number of real estate brokerages still prefer their independent status and some of these have become their own franchised brands, capitalizing on the economic dividends available to them through leveraging themselves.

Although franchising is a powerful force within the industry, REALonomics believes there is still too little careful analysis and quantification of franchising’s market and economic value on the part of owners.

Quantifying a Franchise Value Remains Elusive

In addition, the ability to create economic performance models for a franchise, judge its market impact on a forward moving basis (trending), fully understand the costs and benefits to owners, agents and most importantly, to understand with as much certainty as possible the way in which consumers view franchises, remains quite elusive.

Franchising is a powerful economic consideration for broker/owners and an initial term can represent as much as fifty percent of the life cycle of a contemporary brokerage firm. For some time, franchisors have been negotiating initial franchise commitment terms that will run more than a decade. Another perspective is to consider the lifespan of an executed franchise agreement in terms of the changes that will occur within the industry during this “initial term” of a franchise agreement.

REALonomics will be posing questions, analysis, insights and extending some limited advice regarding how broker/owners can unlock the door to franchise economics. It’s this door that we believe is the key to identifying the benefits to adoption of a real estate franchise.

In true fashion, we will steer our spotlight of analysis and critique on the not-so-oft understood downsides of franchising. We will highlight and accentuate the benefits as we see them. We will ask the powerful questions that should be asked of franchisors who in turn ask broker/owners to pledge their companies to a particular brand at a cost that can sometimes be astronomical.

Framing the Franchise Analysis Correctly

We will help frame questions broker/owners can use to ask franchisors to quantify their economic delivery, their stated marketing value propositions and to clarify the broker/owner’s recourse for sub-standard performance on the part of a franchisor. We will suggest ways for franchisors to remodel some of their old propositions and presuppositions that cannot and do not create value for owners and how they can and should be delivering transparent, consumer-centric solutions that can differentiate them with owners, the market and consumers.

This will be fun, challenging and perhaps a little ugly at times. At the end of the day we hope REALonomics delivers some value to broker/owners, to its general readership and to franchisors.

We want our readers to be a part of the content, so your posted comments, insights, experiences (good or bad), together with private emails and other communication with us will be welcomed by everyone.

Our objective is to see if we can unlock the door to franchise economics, since the state claim of real estate franchisors is their delivery of an economic enhancement and a stronger overall market asset. Broker/owners need to know how a franchise can and should perform on their behalf and how to make the critical judgments associated with the cost versus benefit relationship.

Some initial questions about franchise value might include the following:

1. What is a franchise worth to an owner, i.e., what should today’s initial and ongoing cost be? How do franchises differ from one another, if at all?
2. What is the preeminent economic value of a real estate franchise to Broker/Owners and to agents? Why have new franchises such as Keller Williams and EXIT Realty been successful in the midst of a very crowded playing field?
3. Do consumers have predisposition toward franchise names or, are consumers neutral when it comes to loyalty?

Broker/owners, franchisors and agents are invited to post comments about their franchise experiences, good, bad or indifferent. If you wish to communicate but do not want to post a comment you can use our traditional Contact Form.

Yikes! What have we started now?

Popularity: 16% [?]

As a real estate industry change agent, Jeff Corbett certainly ranks high on the mortgage list. His blog, The XBroker, is a quality diatribe that weaves a clear picture of the confusion and chaos that exists within the mortgage industry and its relationship with the consumer.

Good change agents have an edge to them, typically a sharp edge. Exceptional change agents have a sharp, well informed and analytical edge to them that will cut ones mind open so that it soaks in the message of transformational change. Jeff is a sharp, well informed, analytical agent of change. He is on the march against predatory lending and other kinds of mortgage lending practices that have contributed to a large degree to the current financial state of the union.

ENTER “RATESPEED“

Jeff wants transparency in all things related to mortgage. When we spoke recently, we briefly discussed our respective efforts within the industry but digressed almost immediately to his “RateSpeed” widget for the mortgage industry.

As is usually the case within our industry, disclosure is at the core of RateSpeed. The RateSpeed widget spews out mortgage pricing analysis and its resultant solutions are the kind of transparency that sets the consumer at ease with a sense of “complete” knowledge about the financial ramifications of a mortgage commitment.

Although the RE industry and its biological twin, the mortgage wing, need a dose of RateSpeed widgetry, what we need more than widgets, good as they are, is a dose of the mentality and leadership behind the widgets. Jeff’s widget stems from a mental image of what the mortgage industry’s business model should look like, what it can deliver to the customers in this, our Third Economic Wave, the Consumer-Centric Era.

To REALonomics, RateSpeed is not a widget…the widget is the expression of a kind of business model…of course, that’s what REALonomics thinks about day and night…MODELS.

Behind Jeff Corbett’s RateSpeed widget is a business blueprint and behind the blueprint is a design that delivers a solution to the industry and the consumer. BRAVO!

ENTER “RATESPEED RESISTANCE“

REALonomics admittedly knows less about the fundamental practices of the mortgage industry than it does those of the real estate brokerage industry. But there is an initial and fundamental response to our mutual calls for transformation and transparency…resistance.

Moving from corporate hierarchy models to cooperative and collaborative platforms that embrace complete disclosure will always be met with initial skeptical cynicism and resistance. Nevertheless, the Jeff Corbett’s of this industry are to be recognized for thrusting their widgets into our faces, forcing us to think about transforming a now very sick industry into a new, vibrant and fully fluid, consumer-centric delivery model that our clients love…yes, “LOVE” is what I said.

REALonomics applauds Jeff and all of the rest of the Jeff-like transformers who are inching us forward in our “Qwest for Model Perfect.”

Try RateSpeed. Visit The XBroker.

Popularity: 15% [?]

We needed some laughs at REALonomics today so, we reached out to JibJab and grinned ear-to-ear over this wildly humorous satire. Hope you smile too!

Popularity: 9% [?]

When the stock market took a nose dive, real estate brought growth.

When the economy did poorly, real estate introduced wealth.

When 911 all but destroyed our faith, real estate restored the American Dream.

In many occasions, and in many years, real estate has been the rock to depend, or in some cases even the rocket to ride to riches. But times have changed and the bright years of 2000-2005 have become a dull memory.

It’s not really that real estate itself crashed and burned, but that with new construction out of control, speculation spiraling and lending becoming irresponsible, the burden real estate had to carry became to heavy and the first nail in the coffin ground what was a good thing, to a halt.

Collapsing financial institutions led to immense write offs, allegations and actions of improper conduct led to finger pointing and investigations that in turn led to layoffs and disaster.

With unemployment steadily rising and home prices in a constant month by month decline, the real estate market is brittle and cautiously teetering on which way to go.

With the unprecedented rally of crude oil tethering at $150, and now two government-sponsored entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac possibly requiring government bailout. The pair guarantee around $5 trillion worth of mortgages – that’s almost half of the $9.5 trillion debt of the United States. I think we have just witnessed the second nail being hammered into the heart of real estate. Not good at all.

Let’s pray and hope that we don’t have a third nail – a major terrorist attack on local soil in the foreseeable future. Barring the above, the road to real estate recovery is going to be a slow and bumpy one. Most likely it may only pick up momentum during or after 2010 – especially for areas such as Florida, California and Las Vegas.

So for those of us that earn our daily bread from real estate my message is a simple one: Batten down the hatches, expand your horizons, re-engineer your company, automate your business, market more online – yes, maximize every opportunity. Survive the years 2006-2010 and come out the other side with an automated, more efficient, new paradigm, consumer focused real estate model and you may very well find yourself in the front row to become the Amazon, EBay or Google of real estate.

This post is also posted in Inman Community under the title: Three Gold Stars and Two Rusty Nails.

Popularity: 14% [?]

A few weeks ago, both NAR and the DOJ announced a settlement of the suit broought by DOJ against NAR reagrding its VOW policies and competitive restricition created by the policy.

Here is the official scripted response by NAR from Vicki Cox Golder, 2008 NAR First Vice President & Laurie Janik, NAR General Counsel. NAR President Dick Gaylord is also featured here.

Popularity: 14% [?]