<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rock Solid Melt Down &#8211; Tantrum in SD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/</link>
	<description>real estate business models in the consumer-centric era</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Systems Group blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trulia, Zillow, Prudential Debacle Blog Round-up</title>
		<link>http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Systems Group blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trulia, Zillow, Prudential Debacle Blog Round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...]  Rock Solid Melt Down - Tantrum in SD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Rock Solid Melt Down &#8211; Tantrum in SD [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubbub</title>
		<link>http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubbub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&quot;Soon, maybe sooner than we thought, Broker/Owners are going to begin their embrace of open market business models and opt out of the control schemes that lock them into relationships that are out-dated, unnecessary and counter productive to both their existence and their ROI.&quot;

An excellent post, gentlemen--in fact one of the best I&#039;ve read in recent memory.  I&#039;ve been waiting for some time for a voice such as yours to articulate the heretofore un-articulated.  

This post struck a vein and reminded me of an issue that has been troubling me for quite some time.  That is I could never understand why the efficiencies in business processes brought on by advances in technology and the maturation of the Interne--and the savings they represent for the &quot;controllers&quot;--have never been passed on to the &quot;clients/broker-owners.&quot;  To the contrary, instead of passing on cost savings (too many to enumerate here), the controllers of the traditional business model have only increased their royalty and advertising and referral fees--thereby taking a &quot;double-dip&quot; at the expense of their clients.  Unlike most other business models who have passed on savings to the consumer, and there are numerous examples of this, the traditional real estate franchise models have only taken advantage of their clients ignorance in recent years.  The clients, well, it&#039;s kind of like &quot;they don&#039;t know that they don&#039;t know&quot; type of situation that has gone on for far too long.

No more!

Perhaps NOW is when the switch occurs,when the controllers are shut down, when the clients are finally free to capitalize on the new openess, and when the young lion strikes down the old snaggle-tooth for pride and dominion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Soon, maybe sooner than we thought, Broker/Owners are going to begin their embrace of open market business models and opt out of the control schemes that lock them into relationships that are out-dated, unnecessary and counter productive to both their existence and their ROI.&#8221;</p>
<p>An excellent post, gentlemen&#8211;in fact one of the best I&#8217;ve read in recent memory.  I&#8217;ve been waiting for some time for a voice such as yours to articulate the heretofore un-articulated.  </p>
<p>This post struck a vein and reminded me of an issue that has been troubling me for quite some time.  That is I could never understand why the efficiencies in business processes brought on by advances in technology and the maturation of the Interne&#8211;and the savings they represent for the &#8220;controllers&#8221;&#8211;have never been passed on to the &#8220;clients/broker-owners.&#8221;  To the contrary, instead of passing on cost savings (too many to enumerate here), the controllers of the traditional business model have only increased their royalty and advertising and referral fees&#8211;thereby taking a &#8220;double-dip&#8221; at the expense of their clients.  Unlike most other business models who have passed on savings to the consumer, and there are numerous examples of this, the traditional real estate franchise models have only taken advantage of their clients ignorance in recent years.  The clients, well, it&#8217;s kind of like &#8220;they don&#8217;t know that they don&#8217;t know&#8221; type of situation that has gone on for far too long.</p>
<p>No more!</p>
<p>Perhaps NOW is when the switch occurs,when the controllers are shut down, when the clients are finally free to capitalize on the new openess, and when the young lion strikes down the old snaggle-tooth for pride and dominion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danilo Bogdanovic</title>
		<link>http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Danilo Bogdanovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realonomics.net/2007/03/rock-solid-melt-down-tantrum-in-sd/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>The crack is there and the earthquake is about to begin. The business models of the traditional brokerage firms are already getting challenged and it&#039;s only a matter of time. The consumers want and need change and since they pay all of our (agents) bills in the end, that&#039;s who truly gets the final say.

And like they way Trulia and Zillow handled the whole thing - they should give Prudential some tips on PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crack is there and the earthquake is about to begin. The business models of the traditional brokerage firms are already getting challenged and it&#8217;s only a matter of time. The consumers want and need change and since they pay all of our (agents) bills in the end, that&#8217;s who truly gets the final say.</p>
<p>And like they way Trulia and Zillow handled the whole thing &#8211; they should give Prudential some tips on PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

